The Hampshire Police and Crime Commissioner says that a report into the force's vetting procedures "reflect" her concerns, as she calls for "urgent action".
In a report by His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services (HMICFRS), Hampshire Constabulary was told it needs to improve the way it vets its officers.
The investigation found that 110 people were in or had been moved into designated posts without the required enhanced management vetting clearance, giving them access to sensitive information.
READ MORE: Police force failed to vet officers with access to 'sensitive' information
She said: "For well over three years, I have consistently raised concerns over the Professional Standards Department (PSD) investigative judgement and timeliness of investigations, in addition to the issue of delays and backlogs in the vetting unit.
"The ability to vet individuals quickly and to the appropriate standard is fundamental to public trust and confidence in policing."
"As Commissioner, I have already provided additional funding to support increased staffing within the vetting unit.
"This investment is intended to bring down waiting times, clear the backlog, and ensure that everyone currently serving, or applying to serve, in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, is vetted to the correct level and with appropriate oversight.
"These are all areas I have raised with the Chief Constable and senior leaders in the force, and I have asked for urgent action to expedite improvements across the board."
Last month, the Echo revealed the county's chief constable Scott Chilton was under investigation for a past relationship with a junior colleague. He quit just a few weeks later.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated: 1st January 1970 12:00 am
Report this comment Cancel