A planning application for a small recycling and waste facility near Hedge End has been refused over fears it would have a “detrimental” effect on the countryside.
The application sought to change the use of derelict farmland at Jacksons Farm in Bubb Lane, near Hedge End, to store bulked and recycled aggregate. This change was intended to be temporary, lasting for five years.
IRUK Waste Planning and Consultancy saw its planning application refused by Hampshire County Council (December 11) as it did not meet key policies.
The site covers around 2,400 square meters and partially demolished farm buildings, with skips currently stored there.
Hampshire County Council said that the application did not meet its or Eastleigh Borough Council’s relevant policies. It said it would introduce an “inappropriate urbanising form” of development in the countryside, which would have an “unduly” adverse physical and visual effect.
At the decision-making regulatory committee, Cllr Lesley Meenaghan asked why the “relatively tiny” application is detrimental to the countryside.
Planning officers said it was because the application was against policies.
They referred to policies relating to the design of the development, which stated that waste developments should not cause “unacceptable adverse visual impact” and development of the countryside.
While officers recommended refusal, Cllr Kim Taylor said the grounds weren’t strong enough.
Cllr Taylor said: ‘I’m having a bit of a problem with this because, for me, urbanisation is about moving the population.
“This is a project that will be for five years, isn’t looking to hire more people, isn’t going to build houses, is not looking to provide on-site accommodation for staff, and the buildings are just like barns.
“I think it is on pretty shaky grounds to say that it is contributing in any shape, size or form to urbanisation to be honest with you.
“I am unhappy about this refusal because I don’t think the grounds are strong enough.”
On behalf of the applicant, the planning agent said that the proposal, a low-key, small development in a redundant derelict farmyard, would contribute to the storage of aggregates in the area.
The agent urged the council approve the application, but councillors refused it.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel