TWO of Salisbury's food establishments received poor food hygiene ratings according to information published on the Food Standards Agency.
Food hygiene ratings provide scores based on performance in three categories - hygienic food handling, cleanliness and condition of facilities and buildings, and management of food safety.
The ratings go from zero to five.
Wildwood
Wildwood (Image: Newsquest)
Wildwood Restaurant, located at 18-19 Queen Street, was given a score of two out of five on Monday, December 11.
The restaurant was listed as generally satisfactory on preparation, cooking, re-heating, cooling and storage, along with staff knowing about food safety and food sold or served being safe to eat.
The restaurant was rated as 'improvement necessary' for the cleanliness and condition of facilities and the building. This included hand-washing, pest control, having the appropriate layout and ventilation.
Wildwood was contacted for a response.
YO To Go
YO to Go, a takeaway at Tesco Extra on Bourne Way was given a one-out-of-five food hygiene rating when it was inspected on Friday, December 8.
Hygienic food handling including the preparation, cooking, re-heating and storage was generally satisfactory. The cleanliness and condition of facilities and building including layout, ventilation, hand-washing, and pest-control was very good.
Major improvement was needed for a system or checks to be in place to ensure food sold or served was safe to eat and that staff know about food safety.
Headland's Will Smith representing YO to Go said: “This rating does not reflect the highest standards to which YO! operates and demands across its outlets.
"The issue identified at this site was immediately addressed and has been rectified.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel
You must verify your phone number before you can comment.
Please enter your phone number below, and a verification code will be sent to you by text message.
Please enter the six-digit verification code sent to you by SMS.
Your verification code has been sent a second time to the mobile phone number you provided.
Your verification code has been sent a third time to the mobile phone number you provided.
You have requested your verification code too many times. Please try again later.
Didn’t receive a code? Send it againThe code you entered has not been recognised.
Please try again
You have failed to enter a correct code after three attempts.
Please try again later.
Your phone number has been verified.
Your phone number has been stored with your account details. We will never use it for anything other than verifying that you are the legitimate owner of this account.